Author Topic: Ilona Andrews  (Read 47908 times)

Lilliana

  • Pack Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1134
  • Book Hugger
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #435 on: May 31, 2010, 06:24:24 am »
Oh, I totally agree with you! Ilona and Gordon have brilliantly written Ghastek as likeable so I forget that he works on the 'other' team. But when I see how he has respected Kate in a lot of ways, I wonder if he would turn on her. But, whatever direction Ilona and Gordon write his character will be interesting, of course.  :D
"It's a reflex. Hear a bell, get food. See an undead, throw a knife. Same thing, really." -Kate Daniels

"It's a crime to be so damn talented, when I'm already obscenely good looking, but I try to soldier on as best as I can." – Harry Dresden

Kate

  • modGroup
  • Senior Pack Member
  • **
  • Posts: 2664
  • Trying to stay Zen in the volcano...
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #436 on: May 31, 2010, 06:45:37 am »
In the spoiler chat that Ilona and Gordon had, they said that: Ghastek is VERY power-hungry. He's very good at hiding it, but I think Gordon said something along the lines of, "he has big plans." So I suspect Ghastek would do what's best for Ghastek, regardless of the fact that he does like Kate. If being nice to her goes against his best interests, I don't think he'd hesitate to sell her out.

I don't want to write the great American novel. I want to write the great American beach read. It pays better!

mtomni

  • Mechanic
  • ****
  • Posts: 228
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #437 on: May 31, 2010, 06:51:02 am »
Did I miss what happened to Grendel?

Pfefferminztee

  • Auto-Zauberer
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #438 on: May 31, 2010, 06:54:43 am »
In the spoiler chat that Ilona and Gordon had, they said that: Ghastek is VERY power-hungry. He's very good at hiding it, but I think Gordon said something along the lines of, "he has big plans." So I suspect Ghastek would do what's best for Ghastek, regardless of the fact that he does like Kate. If being nice to her goes against his best interests, I don't think he'd hesitate to sell her out.

So maybe he will use her to get Roland down and all his lackies. Then he'll be the most powerful of the people. But yeah, I agree with you. He is an opportunist.

Kate

  • modGroup
  • Senior Pack Member
  • **
  • Posts: 2664
  • Trying to stay Zen in the volcano...
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #439 on: May 31, 2010, 07:05:33 am »
mtomni, Andrea has Grendel at the end of Magic Bleeds.

Pfeff -- I wouldn't call Ghastek an opportunist. Just VERY pragmatic. And with a very long-term plan.

I don't want to write the great American novel. I want to write the great American beach read. It pays better!

ArtAngel

  • writers
  • Big Bad Wolf
  • ***
  • Posts: 3154
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #440 on: May 31, 2010, 07:14:00 am »
I know Kate always seems to think that Nataraja is the mastermind and that Gastek has no idea what he is up to, but I'm not convinced. I agree that Nataraja is the mastermind, but I'm convinced that Gastek has a very good idea of what he is up to and is just giving him enough rope to hang himself with... a void at the top in the People's palace would be very good for Gastek. I wish I knew more about Rowena so I can figure out where she is in all of this.
"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards for they are subtle and quick to anger." -Tolkien
"F*** subtle" -Harry Dresden

Has

  • Global Moderator
  • Big Bad Wolf
  • *
  • Posts: 3374
    • Patricia Briggs Fans groups facebook page
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #441 on: May 31, 2010, 07:36:41 am »
I agree about Ghastek being an opportunist. I think he is close to guessing if not has guessed Kate's background by now. He has his vamps watching her closely so he will use her in his power plays against Nataraja.
What I find interesting is Erra's comments about Roland's melancholy about losing Kate- I don't think Voron was honest about the reasons why her mother fled with him. I also think this would be a fantastic twist if it was true!
<br />\'You aren\'t scary.  You are a good rabid fan\' Courtesy of another rabid bookpusher called E something ;D

Lilliana

  • Pack Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1134
  • Book Hugger
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #442 on: May 31, 2010, 07:44:38 am »
That would be an interesting twist.

It doesn't register in my brain, but did Voron actually see Kate's mother die?
"It's a reflex. Hear a bell, get food. See an undead, throw a knife. Same thing, really." -Kate Daniels

"It's a crime to be so damn talented, when I'm already obscenely good looking, but I try to soldier on as best as I can." – Harry Dresden

ArtAngel

  • writers
  • Big Bad Wolf
  • ***
  • Posts: 3154
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #443 on: May 31, 2010, 07:48:07 am »
That is something I've been wondering too Has. Is Roland as evil as we thought? I believe he did lots of bad things, but in a life that long anyone would make lots of mistakes and with that much power they would be far reaching mistakes. Was there another reason why he killed her mother? Did Voron raise her to kill to protect herself... or maybe because he was in love with her mother too? So many questions... What really happened?
"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards for they are subtle and quick to anger." -Tolkien
"F*** subtle" -Harry Dresden

Has

  • Global Moderator
  • Big Bad Wolf
  • *
  • Posts: 3374
    • Patricia Briggs Fans groups facebook page
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #444 on: May 31, 2010, 08:14:27 am »
I think Roland is very ruthless and is ambitious but I also he has to be multilayered instead of the being the big bad evil guy, which is way to cardboard cut out villian. I think Kate has to realise that and my gut feeling is that Voron manipulated the situation to get revenge back on Roland and what better is to twist his own daughter against him- I loved the juxtaposition of Erra who is the woman which Voron tried to turn Kate into. I also find it interesting Hugh has held back as well - even though I suspect he has information/proof of Kate's background.
I think the confrontation between Roland and Kate will be very twisty :D
<br />\'You aren\'t scary.  You are a good rabid fan\' Courtesy of another rabid bookpusher called E something ;D

Lilliana

  • Pack Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1134
  • Book Hugger
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #445 on: May 31, 2010, 09:08:08 am »
Has - I like the way you think -- I had some of the same thoughts but couldn't quite put them into words as well as you did.  ;)
"It's a reflex. Hear a bell, get food. See an undead, throw a knife. Same thing, really." -Kate Daniels

"It's a crime to be so damn talented, when I'm already obscenely good looking, but I try to soldier on as best as I can." – Harry Dresden

Salarika

  • Mechanic
  • ****
  • Posts: 305
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #446 on: May 31, 2010, 12:52:24 pm »
Erra keeps referring (sneeringly) to Roland as a builder-type, whereas she's definitely into kicking over the anthill. Or she was. I was never sure all through MB whether Roland had sent her, or whether she saw a chance to kill someone and went awol. They almost sound like avatars of the original forces of order and chaos, and now chaos is out of the picture. Hmmm.
Beyond the farthest shore
Beyond the land
My people are dancing
On the wind.
-Ursula K. LeGuin

Good Mazoku

  • lovebird
  • Senior Pack Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2131
  • Faint heart never won fair lady.
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #447 on: June 01, 2010, 06:43:53 am »
I think Roland may have sent her, or not. The main point is if he did, he didn't send her because of Kate, but because the Pack is getting too big and organized and might represent a problem someday so better take care of it now. So, whether he sent her or not isn't really that important, but the thing is that her being taken out of the picture won't go missed and Roland might decide to take a closer look on Atlanta now. Hugh will also be more suspicious, but I'm curious what will happen with Neemah if he decides to take matters into his own hands. *har har har*  ;D
Non ti fidar di me se il cuor ti manca.

cherie

  • modGroup
  • Mechanic
  • ****
  • Posts: 423
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #448 on: June 01, 2010, 10:12:15 am »
All this speculation about Roland... and I just want to know if Andrea and Raphael will sort themselves out!
Wordpress when I remember to update it...

Pendle

  • Auto-Zauberer
  • *****
  • Posts: 639
Re: Ilona Andrews
« Reply #449 on: June 01, 2010, 01:21:11 pm »
I was rereading the last fight yesterday and came across something interesting that I hadn't noticed the first time round.

After Erra dies and when Curren picks Kate up, there is a vampire watching them... and Kate breaks Erra's blood ward with her own blood so Curran doesn't get hurt again. I wonder if Gastek is piloting that vamp? I have a feeling that he will definitely notice something like that...

I did notice this, but I thought the vampires were in retreat. Though knowing Kate’s luck, this will probably come true.

And Ghastek is already suspicious of Kate’s magical abilities, if the conversation with Andrea in Magic Mourns is anything to go by.

What I find interesting is Erra's comments about Roland's melancholy about losing Kate - I don't think Voron was honest about the reasons why her mother fled with him. I also think this would be a fantastic twist if it was true!

I like this idea. When I read, I figured the same as Kate, that the melancholy was because she got away before she was neutralized.Could be interesting.

I just want to know if Andrea and Raphael will sort themselves out!

They’ll be fine. Especially once Andrea starts working at Cutting Edge with Kate, there were two desks afterall! :D


Though I did pick up on one interesting snippet Ancient or not, (Erra) was still a human.

I feel almost vindicated :P but mostly confused. Who the hell do you have to sell your soul to, to live for six millennia?
Every good Pendle Witch needs a familiar, mine is Louis. He's probably, at this moment, getting cat fur, nails and an assortment of muck all over my pillows. Lols!